STAR WARS DOOMBRINGER STAR DESTROYER MOVIE

But what if it's pulling energy from a star that's 500 times larger than the size of the star it was designed to drain - would it only partially drain the star? I thought it would have been a nice element for Kylo Ren or Hux to demand that Starkiller suck the energy from a much larger star due to their lust for power and desperation in their attempt to defeat The Resistance, which would have resulted in an overload and the base self destructing. the size of the star it was pulling its energy from didn't seem to matter - Poe states that as soon as the light goes out it would be charged.it was stationary (it seems as though it would have a limit as to the distance it could drain a star, and would eventually run out of stars in its quadrant of the galaxy).I feel like the concept of Starkiller Base was unique as it required a star to absorb energy before it could make an attack. After reading and viewing tons of reviews on TFA, it feels like the one complaint that most people share is the similarity of Starkiller Base to the previous Death Stars.Дo you feel like Starkiller Base is the last giant spherical superweapon or will we see more? Did you like Starkiller Base? What would you have preferred to see if you didn't like it and what type of superweapon would you like to see in Episode VIII and/or IX (if any)? However, I would like to address the superweapons in Star Wars, and discuss the possibilities of us ever seeing bases/weapons in future films that aren't in giant spherical form.

STAR WARS DOOMBRINGER STAR DESTROYER MOVIE

Before I say anything, I need to make it clear that I feel like Disney and JJ Abrams did a fantastic job with TFA, the movie was made the way it was for a reason, and I support that.

Star wars doombringer star destroyer